Posted in
church by Roy L. Dunigan on 11/10/2009
Not long ago, CNN aired a story about a church in North Carolina that was organizing an event where the congregation would build a bonfire and burn things they feel were associated with the Devil. Primarily, they targeted the Harry Potter series of books as specifically stated by the church's pastor on television.
So what message are they sending? What could they possibly be accomplishing by burning Harry Potter books? Why is this even newsworthy? I believe the only thing they managed to accomplish was to bring more scorn upon the Christian church. All such actions do is send a message to the world that it is going to Hell because of all the people that read Harry Potter books. It says, "We think we're better than you and you are all sinners and going to Hell to burn for all eternity!"
Frankly it comes across as arrogant. All that particular church has accomplished is to make the world view them as ignorant book burners. They also gave CNN a chance to make the Christian church as a whole look bad which they will gleefully do without hesitation.
I wish I could get the pastor of that church to tell me what he thinks his congregation is accomplishing by burning Harry Potter books. I would love to hear his rationalization about what kind of 'victory' they have by doing so. Since this is the "What would Jesus do" generation, I'd like him, or someone, to tell me when it was documented ANYWHERE in history, not just the Bible, that Jesus engaged in such acts. When did Jesus get into the face of a tax collector or prostitute and scream, "Yer all sinners and goin' ta Hayull!" (You'll have use your imagination and supply your own southern preacher accent to that statement)
I recently read that Daniel Radcliffe, the young actor who portrays Harry Potter in the films, is an atheist. He apparently is a fan of Richard Dawkins, who is the current Atheist guru leading the charge for their cause to sell-out crowds. So once again the church has a reason to hate Harry Potter because Daniel Radcliffe is an atheist and will lead all our children to Hell. But I have to ask the question, "Why is Radcliffe an atheist to begin with?"
Could it be because of the church constantly harping on the evils of the character he plays in the movies? Could it be that all he's heard for most of his young life, from so-called loving Christians, that he is leading the current generation to Hell? Could it be that the constant condemnation that the Harry Potter series has received from church congregations all over the world has driven the young man to seek to prove to himself that there is no God and thus no consequences to his actions in life?
Is the church then responsible for his destruction in the end? What would Jesus do if He met Daniel Radcliffe? What would Jesus say if He met Daniel Radcliffe? What would Jesus say if He observed the church condemning sinners instead of reaching out to them like he did in the Bible? "Cast the first stone?"
The world is growing increasingly hostile toward the church and I say that it is no wonder. The church condemns everything and everyone around it for not falling into line with it's beliefs. We look down our noses at "sinners" and convey the message that we are better because we are going to Heaven and the rest of the world will go to Hell! Some Christians declare it with such an obvious sense of self-righteous satisfaction that it is no wonder we are no longer wanted.
What would the world be like if the church actually reached out to the communities around it? At one point in history, the church was the very center of communities in America but no more. What happened? I dare say that somewhere along the line, church congregations cloistered themselves behind the closed doors of their church buildings and began condemning everything beyond those doors.
Not too many years ago there was a fight about having the Ten Commandments posted outside a courthouse. Suddenly the church made itself heard by crying out against having the monument bearing the Ten Commandments removed. The fact never dawned on anyone that the Ten Commandments were on display at that courthouse for several decades and STILL corruption prospered. Maybe the people of the church were expecting the Ten Commandments to do the job of community outreach for them.
Sadly, I feel its too little to late for the church to turn things around for the current generation. We have established our reputation and now have to deal with the consequences of it. Harry Potter books are being burned and CNN has it's story and more damage is done to the cause of Christ. To change things, we must reach out to the communities around us rather than condemn them.
If you want a small taste of what the world thinks of the Church's condemnation of everything,
check this out and scroll down to the readers' comments.
Warning: Foul language!
Roy is 39 years old and originally from West Virginia. He is in the military having served in
both the Air Force and now the Army. He was raised Baptist but is
pretty much non-denominational now.
I also think that there are times when it is our fault that there are non-Christians out there simply because we've pushed them away due to arrogance and lack of love. And I think the judgment for that will be harsh, even for those who are "saved."
Regarding whether it is a bad witness to decry such lack of love, not at all. It would be a bad witness, in fact, to let such acts go on without calling them out. Much like the temple that Jesus cleared out, those kinds of acts keep people away from God, proclaiming his salvation only for those who can "get right" in advance. Condemning their actions is no more unloving than Jesus'.
But it seems like often we get to be jerks to other Christians. Maybe they were trying to be faithful Christians. If they are Christians, and they thought that books about magic are sinful (which may actually have some biblical merit), then it would be sinful not to say they are of the devil. Now maybe we don't have to make a bonfire, and we who are more spiritual understand that it is an unnecessary step and that Harry Potter isn't really witchcraft, but we are still to be loving and understand that their overreaction is a lack of grace and something we are to bear with them.
Why don't we as Christians stick with those brothers who disagree with us instead of joining with the world in the mockery of those whom Jesus prayed that we be united with (as He and the Father are)?
Saying someone is under the condemnation of God doesn't mean the person saying it is any better than anyone else, as one's own personal profession should be founded upon utter grace. But Paul makes some pretty un-PC comments in his letters as well that would probably be considered hate speech now. But we have to declare it in love, and the task of the Christian is not an easy one, to balance a message that speaks both judgment and love.
I'm curious, though...how would you condemn these types of actions while still showing grace?
In this situation, I don't think the guy is an enemy of the faith (like a bad pharisee or a temple sacrifice seller), but rather an errant brother who has, out of legalism, burdened himself with an unnecessary legality (i Cor 8:7-13). Any confrontation should be personal and in context of a loving familial relationship.
The interactions must also be humble. When we realize that we all alike deserve condemnation and that our redemption is from the sheer free and uncoerced grace of God who, in the person of Christ, gave up his position of glory in order to serve in the most lowly of positions, and that any sin the person has committed has already been paid for in the cross, it makes the playing field more level and creates cameraderie.
Finally it should be restorative, in that it breaks down the legalism that he has. It may be an extended, many-year long proposal. But his problem is that he doesn't understand the grace of God, and that nothing is evil in itself (except rebellion against God's order), and that it may be enjoyed. It may even be beneficial in that it opens up a child's imagination.
But to be realistic, many people in that situation find a reification of their belief in their position as a martyr and true disciple. In that case, one must wear their condemnation as a cross, and let cover a multitude of sins, realizing that, in God's grace, He overlooks much of our sin and clinging to idols. After all, aren't our closets filled with clothes made in sweatshops?
Jesse, can I please clarify, because I am a bit confused by what you wrote - did you mean that it is arrogant to say that "Jesus is the only way"? I apologise if this is not what you meant, that is why I wanted to clarify. Statements that Jesus is the only way are made by Jesus Himself, and are God's truth, and we should never back away from such, just because it might allientate some people. We are not called to blurr the boundaries of God's truth to win the lost. He says that there will indeed be those who will be offended by His truths, but that is for us to leave in His hands to work on.
Yes, we are indeed to speak in love, but also in truth. We are also to let people know that Jesus may be the only way, but also He was sent by God, Who so much wanted to restore His relationship with us, that He sent Jesus to die and pay out debt - so that He could give us Life. It is becasue of God's love. And yes, we are indeed called not to judge lest we ourselves be judged - but that means not just those who are lost, but also our brothers and sisters in Christ. We need to help each other to stand in God's truth, grace and love, and encourage one another to grow and also to reach out to the lost. Tearing one another apart only serves the purpose to keep those who are lost, just that way .... lost.
No, I'm not saying it is arrogant to say that Jesus is the only way. I believe that he is the only way. I was only saying that as an example of something that it is worth taking heat on. We should make that claim because, like you said, Jesus is the only way. But burning Harry Potter is stupid and its a stupid thing for the church to be characterized by.
Regarding whether we should judge unbelievers, we absolutely should not. It is not our role. It never has been. Check out 1 Corinthians 5:12-13.
I just want to put something into perspective here, we are talking about one church burning the books, aren't we? It is very easy to pick out the negative things that are going on and being done by different churches, but the really important thing we should be looking at and for are the things that we can unite through and encourage one another through.
The judgements towards the 'whole' church, because of what one in particular does through mistakenly trying to present God's truths to others, and towards the differences are what keep a lot of God's people not only separate, but too angry, self righeous, and hurt to even consider what He would have us do to reach the lost.
If you see something that really doesn't represent God well, perhaps the first thing you need to do is to pray for the church that is doing it, and then ask God if He is asking you to go and be a part of bringing that church back to His will for reaching out to the lost.
Often the athiest doesn't need to tear us apart or tear the church apart, because we are doing a great job of it ourselves. ...
Add Your comments:
Use this form only to comment on the article that you just read.
If you have a question, please click here to use the Contact form instead. Thanks!